Quote:
Originally Posted by LubeMaster77
I think that the theory may have some holes in it.
|
A study of 1099 people.. to me that says they have got very little data to work with, probably very localised...
For all intent and purpose, they might have been checking the blood of a bunch of health and sport freaks, who happen to exercise on a covered up chemical dump...
Or who knows, maybe those who did loose weight, lost the weight with some kind of odd diet? pills perhaps?
Maybe they just happened to check a group of people who, yes, did loose weight in the last ten years, but no they weren't healthy in those years..
In case i'm not obvious Crack and Meth will make you loose weight, and data seems to indicat that many who loose weight with C or M, actually do keep it off for ten years, no it ain't healthy, yes it will increase the toxin levels in your bloodstream. Hmm, who'd a thunk that?!
Also, a study of blood , that implies the toxins came from fat that was lost 10 years before... Talk about a wild stretch.
Never mind why one would have to loose the weight, and wait 10 years before it becomes an issue.
You'de think that somebody who lost 30 pounds in the last year, would be worse in the blood then somebody who lost it 10 years ago...
Why would toxins either wait 10 years to emerge, or why would toxins remain in the blood, just circulating for 10 years?? Doesn't blood get filtered?
Why don't they go to a liposuction clinic and start analysing the lipo in it's raw form, rather then checking the blood of those who lost weight.
Or simply start a real research and check the fat and blood of a group of people who haven't lost weight, then monitor as they loose the weight.
That might make the whole research worth mentioning, as it stands, i think it's total BS, i'm not doctor, but i do like a better explanation then the article offered.