Thread: .38 or 9mm
View Single Post
Tim Hancock Tim Hancock is online now
MAGA
 
Tim Hancock's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 10,830
Quote:
Originally Posted by nostatic View Post
I second the Buckmark for a .22. I didn't like the angle of the Ruger but ymmv.
Of course the Ruger can be had as either the 22/45 version which is more upright grip (as pictured in my earlier post), or it can be had in the metal framed version which is angled a bit more. I have both a Buckmark camper (bought it last year for my daughter) and a Ruger Mark II SS slab sided 6 7/8" barrel (with a Volksquarten (sp?) heavily modified grip). I do not really have any problem switching between my Glock, the Buckmark or my Ruger even though they are all very different. I have medium sized hands and typically use a thumbs forward high two hand isosceles grip.

Buckmark vs Ruger is a common point of argument between loyal owners of each. Both are great .22 pistols and I am of the opinion that they are equal in performance. That said, I prefer my moderately modded longer barreled Ruger with a sub 2 pound trigger to my daughter's slightly modded just under three pound triggered Buckmark.

It seems that there are a few more aftermarket goodies available for the Rugers than the Buckmarks, but both brands shoot fine right out of the box.
__________________
German autos: '79 911 SC, '87 951, '03 330i, '08 Cayenne, '13 Cayenne

0% Liberal

Men do not quit playing because they get old.... They get old because they quit playing.
Old 09-21-2010, 09:10 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #59 (permalink)