Quote:
Originally Posted by john70t
Big 'ol can of worms.
Next ya'll(S.E. bible belt reference) will be talking about who is "qualified" to view such material: Father? Mother? Adult child m/f? Sub-Adult child m/f?....
(I'm getting out the popcorn.)
If you ya'll were really serious, you be erasing all evidence, all over the world, of DaVinici and other promoters of necked peoples. (gasp).
|
What society finds appropriate or not falls into a discussion of right and wrong, unless you believe in absolute standards of right and wrong, you get what society gives you. David, Venus, and those obese Rubin women are fine for grade schoolers, Linda Lovelace plying her trade isn't even allowed here.
Maybe the question isn't why is some art censored, but rather why does some art that seemingly depicts qualities of pornography not get censored?
__________________
'86na, 5-spd, turbo front brakes, bad paint, poor turbo nose bolt-on, early sunroof switch set-up that doesn't work.
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
|