Quote:
Originally Posted by silverwhaletail
Golf Club Boy was not sleeping. These people seldom sleep. And NEVER at night. methAMPHETAMINE.
|
Perhaps, I did not see the part of him not sleeping and thinking of cleaning out the basement to create a new dope lab whilst on his high in that video.
Quote:
Originally Posted by silverwhaletail
No. US Supreme Courts have "allowed" no-knock warrants so that evidence does not get destroyed. Pretty hard to "justify" any search warrant if 100% of the time you never find what the warrant specified that you were justified in searching for.
And houses catch on fire and burn down when you shoot chemicals inside.
|
It was a single example asked as a question, with the point being that surely if we can put man on the moon decades ago (or hoax it if you so wish to believe) then we can perform raids on houses in a safer manner for both the person being raided but more importantly the officers performing the raid and any innocent bystander that may be affected. Not needing to shoot anyone dead I would think is much easier to explain - whether a raid goes right or wrong.
Take out the neighbourhood, the dead golf club boy, etc... From this equation. This could happen to anyone. Another possibility is the officer being shot dead in the process of raiding the wrong house by a law abiding pelicanite defending his home in a good neighbourhood. "Bad people" and drugs aren't exclusive to certain neighbourhoods. Are raid procedures?
Once again, what I was trying to discuss: Is there a safer way to perform such raids, or is it not going to happen due to red tape, cost, winning elections?