Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Lee
No lawsuit or charged for the RM2's false accusation or police report? You guys shouldn't have to pay for her behavior.
|
(+1, but taking the anger management course was a show of "settlement" in this heavily biased situation.)
The cell phone could have been argued "communal property" shared between a man and wife(just like all his vehicles, money and/or property after a divorce).
There should have been anti-infidelity laws dug up from the archives as well.
Nobody witnessed her behaviour at that time either. Perhaps his friends have some experience with this.
Britain has new "anti-verbal" and "ant-psychological" abuse laws for spouses....which should be applied equally to the sexes. Women can engage in this type of abuse as easily as men.
There was recently another similar case here in the US, where another hubsband got the book thrown at him for taking her cell phone. Wife was cheating with her abusive ex-husband uring which the child was abandoned by her.
Apparently the PA's office was bored and overfunded.
Male=automatic loss.