|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 30
|
I did a bit more research into the engine numbers and the reason the SC felt quicker than the 3.2 is because
the 3.2 engine is the 204hp version, not the 231hp version, and the SC is 180hp plus the SSI's so it's probably not that far away in terms of hp. Add to that the SC being a lighter car, and it would explain it. The 79 SC also felt quicker than the 1981 204hp SC I drove a few days earlier.
Now I can always do some work to that 3.2.......
Last edited by jbdave; 02-20-2011 at 02:24 AM..
|