|
Registered Usurper
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 13,824
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esel Mann
I don't think anyone here or anyone anywhere else will state that mathematical notation/syntax is perfect.
Mmmmm, I'm not clear on that Esel. Math notation seems to work perfectly satisfactorily, no? And, can an equation with imperfect syntax be valid?
To answer your comment/question, the reason for the differing ways to represent multiplication as well as division has to do with (A) what can be easily printed with the available means, (B) short-hand to permit more equation per inch or to permit an equation to be more quickly written.
Good - I don't think that that has been mentioned.
Nevertheless, representation of an operator, does not fall under rules for handling mathematical operators. It falls under representation of a mathematical operator.
It's saddening to see this post disintegrating like others (seems to be happening more and more) into more hate than honest debate.
Sad, but not surprising. The hate's coming from those who came up with the answer, 2 ...and just HATE being proved wrong and won't admit it.
I don't harbor any feelings of hatred myself; I think this thread is hilarious and I'm having a ball taunting the haters. 
|
..
__________________
'82 SC RoW coupe
|
04-25-2011, 10:35 AM
|
|