Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffgrant
Anal.
|
Sure, it might be anal. But... that's pretty much exactly what happened, only she didn't win.
A discussion revealed that, had she in fact won, I would have only been privy to the return of my original dollar amount.
Which seems pretty selfish to me.
I suppose the better way to have phrased the question would have been under the selfishness category, not the morality category. If it were a loan, morally, there's no obligation to return any amount more than the original. If it were a gift, there's no obligation at all.
Is there something between "gift" and "loan?"