Quote:
Originally Posted by milt
I support the tint laws. You want anonymity, hire a limo. If I were a LEO, I'd be real concerned about tint. Even with the driver's window rolled down completely, there's not enough view of the interior.
|
So we should base our life choices on the ability for Big Brother to know our activities?
So it's legal to have a cargo van with NO windows (zero light transmission) to the rear or rear sides, but you're worried about dark tint?
99.99% of the population doesn't pose any threat to law enforcement, so why should you or I have to put up with the dangers of glare while driving -- much more dangerous overall.
Quote:
|
But what my most important objection to dark tint is stems from having to follow a blacked out car. Not a low F 430, but any SUV that I might be behind prevents me from seeing ahead. You all know out on the track you are looking as far ahead as possible. With turns and elevation, it's easy. On the highway, it's not. I stay back far enough, but I'd still like fair warning if someone is about to nail the brakes because they were asleep at the wheel.
|
Better not follow any cargo vans, tall trucks/SUVs, 18 wheelers, garbage trucks, city buses, pickups with stuff in the back (ya know, actually doing work) or any other number of vehicles with LEGAL blocked rear views.
Tint laws are mostly B.S.