|
Dog-faced pony soldier
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: A Rock Surrounded by a Whole lot of Water
Posts: 34,187
|
Missiles are expensive. Particularly guided/smart munitions. Once the initial hardware is installed, these things are dirt cheap - the energy is a non-issue with nuclear reactors. Ability to sit offshore and pummel targets all day long becomes very beneficial versus using the same number of high-dollar guided missiles or smart munitions.
Very cool technology.
As said before, this isn't even close to orbital velocity. Yes, it could be attained but it would be a much bigger apparatus. There was a proposal I remember seeing a long time ago (maybe from "Cosmos" or some such) using a railgun type setup running up a mountainside - the idea being that it would allow the acceleration to be gradual enough to not destroy payloads all the way to orbital velocity to deliver stuff to space-based stations or other facilities/crafts. Theoretically possible with today's technology.
To get people into space would require a much longer run - the Space Shuttle limits acceleration to about 3gs and it takes all the way from FL's east coast to roughly the Indian Ocean to accomplish that. I don't think a rail track that long would be built anytime soon given our current budget situation... Admittedly they might be able to shorten the run by using higher g accelerations but that reaches a practical limit pretty quickly (human physiological limitations).
__________________
A car, a 911, a motorbike and a few surfboards
Black Cars Matter
Last edited by Porsche-O-Phile; 05-27-2011 at 08:59 AM..
|