Quote:
|
Quote de ratpiper71T
Please show outside source where this is verified. I'll agree with 911novice and call bull$hit on everything pesto said. Suppositions, fabrications, lie speak and all to convince a buyer or potential victim-(workup another sucker).
Read page 38 (& most specifically post # 751) . Someone who had read this thread slightly earlier , read about the 'expert' (Mr. Andrew Prill) being hired by someone involved and testifying regarding his 'expert' inspection ...and the conclusions he determined from it. AND wrote to Mr. Prill pointing him to this thread.
Mr. Prill wrote back a responce , it was posted in post # 751 by the person who had written to him. It's fact (the court case) , this so-called 'expert' Mr. Prill ...got someone else stuck with this car. Or at least caused them to not get a judgement in regards to it's (non) authenticity. I believe a later buyer after pesto (who was probably the plaintiff in this case..but I am not positive where he actually fits into the chronology) even has chimed in on this thread briefly. Although , I believe it was prior to the court ruling. So nothing regarding the 'expert' inspection / testimony was provided . And i do not think he ever came back. You would have to read the thread from that point back to find his posts.
SO , that is why in MY book . There is a large grey cloud hanging over Mr. A. Prill's ability as to being an 'expert' in 1973 RS 2.7. . Which will be floating over him until it's proven to me that ANY major portion of the current 1316's main shell is from the original chassis. Maybe there is , maybe not. But knowing how lazy most people are (or unwilling to spend the funds required). And especially knowing the work was apparently done long ago. I highly doubt the body was taken apart and had major sectioning surgery done like a competant restorer of a damaged RS would do today (or maybe I will say SHOULD) .
|
I agree with your logic and have read all the posts in this thread. But again I say where are the links to this case there has to be some record of at least where or when it happened,---court dockets- showing the occurrence if not the details or content of the case. Without that you have only posts on car forum, unprofessionally placed Internet ads, companies and so-called experts that no one has heard of. Quite a few people on this thread including some of the aforementioned have never posted on another topic in ths forum...until some one can point to official sources... I call bull$hit on it all.