View Single Post
cashflyer cashflyer is offline
Bill is Dead.
 
cashflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Alaska.
Posts: 9,633
I've owned Barracuda fastbacks in the past... a '67 and a '68.
The '67 was a 383 car. The engine had continuous cooling problems in the summer. Without power steering, it was a beast to steer at low speed. I don't think I would buy another one, but it would be a lot of fun with the manual trans. The 6.3 liter engine only pumped out 300hp*, but had a lot of torque.

I was much happier with my fathers Barracuda coupe, which was equipped with a 340. The 340 was a lighter, higher revving engine that produced almost as much horsepower as the 383. And it didn't overheat in the summer.


$39,000 for a 993 that needs engine work?
I would think the 930 would be a better catch.


Pic:




*1967 = 280hp; 1968 & 1969 = 300hp.
Source: Allpar
__________________
-.-. .- ... .... ..-. .-.. -.-- . .-.
The souls of the righteous are in the hand of God, and no torment will ever touch them.

Last edited by cashflyer; 07-20-2011 at 08:33 AM.. Reason: added horsepower figures
Old 07-20-2011, 08:32 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #10886 (permalink)