Now I see what you're talking about
: the height of the friction surface. Hadn't noticed that before, but yes, the friction surface of the 1994 3.6T rotor is taller than on the 1991-92 C2T rotor.
Hadn't noticed the different C/D pattern, either, but it makes sense that as the friction surface is taller another row of holes was added, too.
Good to know -- thanks!
So the C2T can use the 3.6T rotors, but not the other way around as the lower section of the 3.6 pad would hang off the friction surface.
(Not that a 3.6T owner would want to -- the C2T rotors are more expensive.)