Quote:
Originally Posted by Normy
Read my original post. There is nothing about 3.0 that means anything to me, but my neighbor's thoughts are interesting; Since they've gone to water cooling on the flat 6 they have steadfastly avoided this exact engine size. I don't know, but for some reason it just seems strange, since for ages many cars were just shy of 3.0 liters.
N
|
Why are they so steadfastly "avoiding' it, according to you?
The 3.0 SC was a 2994 cc engine, does that mean they were steadfastly avoiding to make it a 2995 cc??
They never made a 1684,65 cc either, were they steadfastly 'avoiding' that too??...
They just didn't make a 3.0 liter engine for a while, so what.
They didn't avoid it, they just had other ideas and plans and went with those.