View Single Post
davidbir davidbir is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Point Roberts, WA and Vancouver BC
Posts: 535
Quote:
Originally Posted by fryardds View Post
You are correct. There is not one part of this car, including the chassis, that can be proven to have come from the original RS 1316.
So far as we know---that was my point.

It may be a case of the chassis plate being lifted up and another car being slid underneath it ,or, it may be that the engine, then the body, then the gearbox, etc were replaced over time..only one person knows. According to the ruling above if even the ashtray from the original car was swapped over then there may be a case for "originality". If not one single part was swapped over there may still be a legal claim if "continuity" can be established. Whether we approve or not!
Or, it is just a case of fraud...

My point in posting the judicial ruling from England was that this resets the bar for proving/disproving "Originality" as we view it.

I very much doubt we have heard the end of either of these two cases.
__________________
Too many cars, not enough moolah...

Last edited by davidbir; 03-12-2012 at 05:48 PM..
Old 03-12-2012, 05:44 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #880 (permalink)