|
Gon fix it with me hammer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In Flanders Fields where the poppies blow
Posts: 23,537
|
tactical nukes? Sure thing, but you do realize that if your neighbor has a negligent or accidental discharge, that it could be rather more annoying then a .45 through the wall, right?
And if you say Tac Nuke, how about Bio weapons? Same principle , right?
till off course your other neighbour trips while he's walking to the car and his CCW permitted Highly Virulent strain of Ebola vial falls out of his incorrectly used holster...
damn. there goes the neigborhood.
Seriously, i can understand the right to bear arms, and to arm bears.
But nothing in that 2nd Amendment covers Bio or tac Nuke weaponry.. And i rather doubt yer founding fathers would have included Bio or Tac Nukes if they knew about them in their day.
So no, the amendment doesn't exclude them perse, but really, it should.
Cause no amount of certification can prevent stupid from happening.
And that's all i'm going to say about that since i would prefer to keep this thread from going PARF
__________________
Stijn Vandamme
EX911STARGA73EX92477EX94484EX944S8890MPHPINBALLMACHINEAKAEX987C2007
BIMDIESELBMW116D2019
|