Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick V
If the issue is a result of Partner B's work, then Partner B should make good on it. Just in a stand behind your work type of situation. If the work in question was done after the partner split then it is on Partner A to find someone to correct the issue and make Customer A happy.
The end result should be a happy customer and who makes it that way is really doesn't matter to Joe.
|
I don't think you caught the drift. Kevin is P B. He did not paint the car from what I'm reading. Whoever did, messed it up. If Kevin did it in the first place, that's one thing. But it sounds to me like P A took it somewhere to have it done as he didn't have the facilities. Now you have a third party (P) involved who is apparently not going to redo the work.
It can get complicated. Joe's car was started when A and B were in business. The car was finished by A with P. I can see the writing on the wall from here. P is blaming B for poor work under the paint.
People are like that.
Here's where Joe stands. "A" better have had an active repair licence on file or he was acting as an illegal shop when he took over the car. If he did, the State will iron this out....eventually. They are way understaffed these days.