Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeke
I don't think you caught the drift. Kevin is P B. He did not paint the car from what I'm reading. Whoever did, messed it up. If Kevin did it in the first place, that's one thing. But it sounds to me like P A took it somewhere to have it done as he didn't have the facilities. Now you have a third party (P) involved who is apparently not going to redo the work.
It can get complicated. Joe's car was started when A and B were in business. The car was finished by A with P. I can see the writing on the wall from here. P is blaming B for poor work under the paint.
People are like that.
Here's where Joe stands. "A" better have had an active repair licence on file or he was acting as an illegal shop when he took over the car. If he did, the State will iron this out....eventually. They are way understaffed these days.
|
Not exactly. I didn't "pull the trigger" on the gun but I did oversee every step of the restoration while I was a member of the L.L.C.. I haven't seen the defect in question so I can't say what the problem may be. It may not actually need to be re-sprayed, but then again it might. It is obvious from the customers standpoint that he shouldn't have to ask twice for the defect to be addressed.
From my standpoint, I'm still trying to survive the huge mess that partnering with Member A has caused. Financially I know it's not over, although keeping my doors open is a day to day struggle here. Anybody in their right mind would have pulled the plug long ago. Emotionally it's been devastating, losing the business I started 20 years ago to some low life that doesn't know which end of the screwdriver goes in the slot has been hard to swallow.
Personally I feel like I've had enough stolen that I'm not going to give more away that I'm not obligated to.