Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanPizzle
you are what is wrong with america. Some people are always looking for people to blame and sue. Dude, the car is used. There will be issues. What's a battery cost $150? What does it cost to resurface a wheel? $200. Is the chipped rotor even a functional issue?
It is a used car. Suck it up. None of them are perfect. Caveat emptor. Sounds like buyers remorse.
|
I disagree. The whole point of a PPI is to be someone's eyes when they can't be there themself. I can see missing some small things, but hell, a chipped rotor? Peeling clearcoat? Stating the wrong kind of battery?
If that's acceptable in a PPI, then there's no point in having one - you may as well buy the car blind.
But like cashflyer said, I'm 99% certain that there's no liability on their part - a court would have them refund the cost of your PPI, and nothing else.
What you need to do is go after the seller. I think you might have a case for non-disclosure of the rotor. The battery, not a chance - that's a wear item. Peeling clearcoat on a wheel? I doubt it. But the rotor is something that should be disclosed by any honest seller.