|
This seems very simple to me. Saddam invaded another country and would not leave. So it was decided that war was the only option to get his troops to leave. The war was won and Iraq (Saddam) was forced to live by some common sense rules. You don't allow people who invade other countries to keep building weapons. Saddam has decided not to live by these rules. Would we have let Germany, Italy and Japan build the A-bomb right after they lost WWII? He has played games for 12 years now. At what point do we enforce the rules the UN has layed down. I have one question for those of you who don't think we need a war to end this. Please tell us all what you think we should do. I hear people saying peace not war on TV every day. Not once do these people have an idea of what to do. Do you think we should just forget about the rules we handed down after the last war. Should we just let him build up an army again? Should we not care if he builds nukes or toxic weapons? Do you think he has learned his lesson and won't use his weapns or armies? Maybe we should give him one more chance, as if 12 years wasn't enough. Please tell us all your ideas on how to deal with a dictator who won't disarm and has a history of invading his neighbors.
|