View Single Post
70SATMan 70SATMan is online now
Ayo Irpin, Ukraine!
 
70SATMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 12,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Groesbeck Hurricane View Post
prosecutor offers "bargain" to admit to allowing dog to roam and bite someone. Does not require proof of intent BUT is considered an infraction similar to a parking violation.
So, it sounds as if you were cited for the dog roaming separately and the dog bit someone. If this is the case then you'll have to deal with that.

I'd tell em to pack sand on the bargain.

Based on everything you've stated I see no way they could prove you knowingly or unknowingly allowed the livestock to roam. You have documentation showing your management of the livestock I presume and if the police incident report mentions cut locks, missing cameras etc,,,,,,

The burden of proof is on the Prosecutor. I'd grill him on the evidence he intends to present to try to persuade him to drop the charges or loose a case in court. He will have to prove you were negligent.
__________________
Harmlessly passing gas in the grassland away;
Only dimly aware of a certain smell in the air
Old 04-17-2013, 10:48 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #21 (permalink)