[Groesbeck Hurricane]

Originally Posted by romad

You telling us you were not home maybe out of the county or state (which is it) and someone or persons vandalized your property, which lead to the law pressing charges for loose animals and they want you to plead some dog charge against some dog who doesn;t exsist????

We're not getting the whole story here something is missing. Why would they be going thru all this? for some cows that got loose ...really class c felony?

You are getting the gist of the story: Person owns property. While person is out of state or out of county (all instances happen when owner is away) property is vandalized leading to police responses. Prosecutor is demanding property owner plea guilty to their dog being loose and biting someone (dogs were never loose, never bit anyone, and were never involved in any of the instances).

Yep, prosecutor was pushing for felony charges for being the victim of vandalism resulting in the release of their livestock. As it stands, misdemeanor charges for being the victim.

Believe it or not, this is the whole story short of who property owner believes is responsible which cannot be gone into publically.