View Single Post
winders winders is online now
Racer
 
winders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 5,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Verburg View Post
There goes windbag(again), he hasn't a clue so he resorts to spewing bullsh**
You are the windbag spewing bullsh**.

Look here:

Order of arithmetic operations; in particular, the 48/2(9+3) question.

To quote:

"A problem that hit the Internet in early 2011 is, "What is the value of 48/2(9+3) ?"

Depending on whether one interprets the expression as (48/2)(9+3) or as 48/(2(9+3)) one gets 288 or 2. There is no standard convention as to which of these two ways the expression should be interpreted, so, in fact, 48/2(9+3) is ambiguous. To render it unambiguous, one should write it either as (48/2)(9+3) or 48/(2(9+3)). This applies, in general, to any expression of the form a/bc : one needs to insert parentheses to show whether one means (a/b)c or a/(bc)."


Are you a published Professor Emeritus from an institution as prestigious as the University of California, Berkeley?

George M. Bergman | Department of Mathematics at University of California Berkeley

George M. Bergman -- publications and preprints

Scott
Old 06-12-2013, 06:10 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #494 (permalink)