Quote:
Originally posted by speeder
A big part of the argument of the pro-war crowd is the "clean hands/ dirty hands" theory that basically disregards any contrary, inconsistent policies of ours in the past, (such as arming Iraq 15 years ago), which does have some legitimacy, (hope I haven't lost you here, read slooooowly),  , so therefore I am asking for evidence that supports attacking them NOW, as opposed to the danger of letting the U.N. do their job. TIA, 
|
I guess we made the problem, so we are cleaning it up now.
As far as why we are attacking right NOW, I don't have that answer. I wonder why NOW was the time. However, I have more faith in the US gubmint than the United Nations. Interesting times are ahead. What I do know is that our enemies do not abide by past rules of war. Perhaps this requires a proactive offense to promote good defense. I'm just guessing...
Jurgen