[gacook]

Yes, Matt...but statistically speaking, we have found that a lot of the "information" we were provided..."under duress," was not always accurate. Some people (some of which were completely innocent) simply told their interrogators what they wanted to hear, or gave them some--ANY--BS to "make it stop."

I've been a part of a few studies done where they've determined the best route to "accurate" info is by gaining the trust of the interogatee...actually becoming their "friend," so to speak. BUT in the heat of combat, where every second counts, we don't have time for that. So, that which needs to be done to get the best possible intel is done. It's war. Nothing is pretty in war, and people need to get that through their heads.