Quote:
Originally Posted by targa911S
|
A '69 911S is not even a desirable car in my book. Or put better, it's the least desirable early 911S by a wide margin. Long wheelbase, under-powered 2.0 liter, schitty in-between styling, etc... Don't get me wrong, a perfect one would still be cool but it's the bottom of the barrel for early "S"s.
A '67 is an extremely cool car and a '70/'71 2.2 911S would be on the top of my list but a '69 is a dog. I've all but lost interest in old 911s as the values/prices have gone cukoo and the supply of great cars has dried up like a prune in the desert. My interest has switched to newer cars where the value:fun ratio is the other way around. I'd rather pay $40k for a dinged-up 997S than $100k for some complete dog's ass old 911 that smells like a whore house. The people buying them for these prices
are not enthusiasts. They're douche bags.
