Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedSpace
That was a hypothesis. That is, I had an experience years ago and wondered if this experience is consistent with what the data would show. The questions we asked are standard engagement questions that were used in employee satisfaction or engagement surveys and NOT specifically chosen to support negative findings for unions. The data supports itself and holds up to scrutiny quite well.
The conclusion I have come to in the first sentence was based on my years of research. Sorry, I hope your experience is different.
|
Individual stories are good, whether they're bad, ugly or whatever, what they don't do though, is tell the whole story. Of course, many of us, myself included, have been witness to Union job-type situations. However, it doesn't matter how many anecdotes you and others might have good or bad, the bottom line is the protection Unions provide for you and others that are not in a union. Just like Syria, Obama got them to lay down their weapons based on our capability of mass destruction. If you and your brethren of Conservative dogma think that a Corporatist America should be the final arbiter of wages via a 'free market' (don't get me started on how unfree markets really are), then you've been drinking the koolaid a tad too long. There's no way your little bit of 'employee satisfaction' hypothisis is going to ever represent the workplace as a whole. In fact, I reckon the only outlet for the results of your skewed perceptions, would sell on Fox News, and it's undereducated masses.