|
Lambda CIS: US CO Spec vs. Closed-loop duty cycle
Splitting hairs a bit I know but....
I recently went back to running my O2 sensor/stock CO specs on my US 81 SC (vs. running rich with no O2). Car runs surprisingly well with great driveability after a fresh O2 sensor, fresh O2 relay and a new male O2 connector from Louie85.
I set the mixture using my Gunson to 0.6-0.8% at the cat test port (O2 unplugged). Took multiple readings on multiple days and all were same result. Plug O2 back in and CO goes to 1.0 -1.2 at cat test port.
I then put a good dwell meter on test port in engine bay and observed a consistent closed-loop dithering between 49-54 on the 4cyl scale (55-60% range duty cycle). Bosch book says target of 45-55% duty cycle (50%) indicating I am slightly lean currently.
I would like to set to the proper factory spec, see how it runs and then go from there. I also have to pass emissions soon so want to start out at baseline specs. I know Gunsons can have a decent margin of error, so question is this:
Is the US CO idle spec slightly lean by design and the O2 corrects it (my Gunson got CO spec pretty much right), or should the US CO spec of 0.6 +- .2 before cat = ~50% closed-loop duty cycle which means I am still slightly lean against the spec (my Gunson was a little off)?
I have to believe based on dwell readings I am probably very close to hitting the US spec settings if not there already (depending on answer to question above).
Thanks in advance.
__________________
Scott
1981 911SC Targa - Platinum Metallic
|