Quote:
Originally Posted by RWebb
if you bother to read the article you will find that
[1] a top notch scientist finds out that a chemical is dangerous
[2] the company making the chemical spies on him, attempts to assassinate his character, etc. (this is proven by their own internal records)
[3] the chemical company hires their own scientists who nitpick his studies and create some flawed studies of their own
Sam Gore sammy - I did not know you were a shill for this company also - congrats on your second job
|
PARF response:
[1] No chemical that generates profits is dangerous, period.
[2] If an independent scientist objects he must be discredited, period.
[3] All PARFers are 100% behind chemical/oil companies, period