[Groesbeck Hurricane]

Yep. I am sitting there saying it is to provide possible examples or for example. They are stating it is showing the only and specific items that are allowable.

Horrible, horrible clause, poorly written and far too vague.


Incidentally, I HATE "including, but not limited to". Provides a door through which a freight train could pass. Sideways.


I'll probably never be able to follow-up on this one but it goes down the road of: Misquoting the contract, quoting another contract and stating it is the one we are working on, removing verbiage in your quote to make your point and ignore the contract.

Jack and Jill went up the hill to fetch a pail of water.

becomes

Jack and Jill crossed the street to get the pail of water.

or

Jack went up the hill to fetch a pail.


I just love these things....