|
I don't disagree with you at all, Toby.
It's not that difficult to take a quick thermal image of the home (God knows they spend enough money on other "toys"). When they see imagery showing there's kids on the premises, that should change how they respond, so as to protect the innocent amongst the possible guilty. Is it really that important to catch the guy "red handed" before he can flush his pot down the toilet that they're accepting the risk of harming our youth?
Collateral damage is a known and accepted risk of war. Should it be so for law enforcement?
__________________
Guy
'87 944 (first porsche/project car)
|