Quote:
Originally Posted by RANDY P
Punk has NO IDEA that the plane must meet FAA standards to fly- Boeing can't just slap an airplane up there, it's not like a car where you can hack and modify and no one cares. He just doesn't get the connection.
He needs to stick with screwing up Homonyms - that's what he does best.
PS-feel the love CP, feel the love 
rjp |
i am well aware an aircraft must meet FAA standards before flying in the USA.
meeting FAA standards does not mean it is a safe aircraft.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HardDrive
You post a smear job against an American company by Al Jazerra, and expect to be taken seriously?
The 787 is a groundbreaking plane. Its roll out was indeed rocky, and that process was made more difficult by Boeing managements highly questionable choice to produce the plane from global suppliers.
But its still a revolutionary plane. And it has a perfect safety record. And it still continues to sell like hot cakes. Are ALL of the airline executives around the world simply suckers? Have all the aviation engineers on earth been cowed into silence? No. Unlike you, they understand how minor the issues that have hobbled the 787 really are.
Sorry man, but posting something like this really does you make you look like a liberal dupe. Your urge to spread Anti-American sentiment has simply gotten the best of you.
|
so, you admit that boeing has had a rocky and unreliable start, but because the source is one specific new agency, you doubt its credibility? even when boeing excecs are already well known for pulling this kind of stuff previously on rollout?
lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by cairns
If the OP knew anything about airplanes (which he clearly doesn't) he would know that every new aircraft and certainly every new aircraft which pushes technological boundaries (which the 787 clearly does) has teething problems. The 787s problems are no more serious (and arguably far less) than those afflicting the A380 and the A350 or the 777, 707, DC-10, DC-7 or B-29 if you want to go back that far.
And if the example of "journalism" he posted is that of a "perfectly respected news source" journalistic standards have hit a new low.
He should stick to spouting liberal ka-ka in parf.
|
same response as above ^^^
some of you are really letting PARF overflow into the rest of your lives. can't say im surprised frankly, kinda the way i always thought of PARFs conservatives. disappointed is more the correct term.
OMG its got a muslim NAME! posted by someone i disagree with politically, IT MUST BE BULL ****
amazing.