Quote:
Originally Posted by john70t
This goes well above my pay-grade and limited brain, but start from a base:
-Agent is a "buyers agent" by contract. Not dual agent.
-Agent fulfilled all timely communication/paperwork obligations of his/her trade.
-Agent did not relay proprietary/personal economic information of the buyer to the seller at any point.
-Contract was for a property fully owned by seller.
-Contract signers were verified representatives of Fannyassjerks, and had full authority to act as sellers agents.
-Contract was agreed upon in writing, through verified methods.
-No other outstanding contingencies applied to Transfer of Title, as witnessed by seller.
-Buyer had verified means for payment of property transaction.
-Buyer even waived all other possible outstanding contingencies and accepted responsibility for such.
-Buyer and buyer's agent complied with stipulations of all governmental forms and timelines.
-Seller agreed to transaction in writing
-Seller then reneged inexplicably without reason.
-Buyer lost ???
[potential earnings based upon historic data? family homestead and enjoyment? something]
|
You earned your pay grade.
yes to all but highlighted line. We did give our verification of funds. it was substantially more then the asking price. Maybe that was the downfall on our part. I purchased properties over the years, I have never had an issue with the selling party asking for more based on the amount we had in the bank. Maybe fanny**** did? Those greedy bastards and that money doesn't go to them personally. So, what the fk? Only 160kl was owed on the note.