View Single Post
masraum masraum is online now
Back in the saddle again
 
masraum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central TX west of Houston
Posts: 57,103
Ok, yesterday I pulled the article up on the BBC website. The first time that I looked at the pic in the article, it was very, VERY plainly white and gold. The white looked like it was underexposed due to harsh backlighting which made it look a little bit bluish gray. I got distracted by work and then went back to finish reading the article a bit later, and that time, I thought I was looking at a completely different picture. I even reloaded the page and waited a bit to see if they had used an animated gif to show two different pictures, because the second time, the shot was clearly of a blue and black dress. Same picture, same webpage, same environment, but my brain perceived it completely differently.


Quote:
The original image is in the middle. At left, white-balanced as if the dress is white-gold. At right, white-balanced to blue-black. swiked
Interesting, my wife hadn't seen/heard of this. I sent her to a website to look at the pic and she saw white and tan/gold. I then changed the lighting in the room and she pulled her glasses off and she saw how it could be blue and black.

The problem to me is clear, it's a crappy cell phone pic, but I have to say, I was shocked, shocked to the point of believing that I was being screwed with at how different the same pic on the same website on the same computer screen at the same desk in the same lighting looked to me when I looked two times but a few mins apart. I think the dress is blue/black, BTW.
__________________
Steve
'08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960
- never named a car before, but this is Charlotte.
'88 targa SOLD 2004 - gone but not forgotten
Old 02-28-2015, 07:41 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #8 (permalink)