Quote:
Originally Posted by fintstone
No. The agency hires the contractor. The contractor hires employees who then have a security investigation done by another unqualified contractor who was hired by another company who was also the lowest bidder as required...who then got him a clearance through investigation by another contractor.
The responsibility is the stupid voter who elects a stupid represenative who cuts the number of Feds and military and their respective compensation to the point where gvt cannot run efficiently and effectively.
How exactly can you "secure the information" on your network from the guy who runs your network?
|
What you call an agency, I see as the government. If the operation is secret, then the agency running it is responsible.
__________________
'86na, 5-spd, turbo front brakes, bad paint, poor turbo nose bolt-on, early sunroof switch set-up that doesn't work.
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
|