Thread: China F1
View Single Post
TheMentat TheMentat is offline
Registered
 
TheMentat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ocean Park, BC
Posts: 2,451
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deschodt View Post
What bothers me is that it's such a simple fix.... Let the manufacturers test. Period, Done. Good for young drivers, for sponsors, spectators, the show (eventually). $ wise it's false economy to restrict it, they have the $ (check out MacLaren's HQ!) and will spend it on CFD or sims instead. If you wanna restrict it to engine testing, fine, use old chassis.... But they must test so that we have at least a shot a engine parity....

Yes Mercedes did a better job and deserved a WC, they will even get 2.... But witht he current token system, it'll take a cluster**** on their side and 5 years for Renault, Honda and Ferrari (who did a better job) to equal them. I know Ferrari is closer, but I get the feeling Mercedes is just playing with them.
I think we can agree on the engine token system, however, I wouldn't re-instate testing. Sure, the bigger teams use the money on CFD and sims, but I think the returns / $ spent is much smaller on lab work than testing. Re-introducing testing will just widen the gap between the bigger and smaller teams.
__________________
Silver '88 RoW Carrera
Grey '06 A4 Avant
Old 04-13-2015, 11:27 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #18 (permalink)