[patz]

Edit: I neglected to credit the writer, Woody on Windows.

http://www.infoworld.com/article/2922604/microsoft-windows/microsoft-re-re-re-issues-controversial-windows-10-advertising-patch-kb-3035583.htmlWhen Microsoft first released KB 3035583 on March 27, I was mystified. I couldn't figure out why Microsoft was releasing an optional patch entitled

"Update enables additional capabilities for Windows Update notifications in Windows 8.1 and Windows 7 SP1" and describing it with only a brief blurb:





Devops Digital Spotlight
Download the Devops Digital Spotlight

With vastly increased demand for new code, enterprises can no longer afford long, slow development

Read Now


This update enables additional capabilities for Windows Update notifications when new updates are available to the user. It applies to a computer that is running Windows 8.1 or Windows 7 Service Pack 1 (SP1).

That's the entire explanation we've received from Microsoft to date.

[ For all the latest updates on Microsoft's operating system, see "Where Windows 10 stands right now." | Stay up on key Microsoft technologies with the Microsoft newsletter. ]

On April 3, the patch reappeared, this time marked "Important" on Windows 8.1 PCs, and "Optional" on Windows 7 PCs. As an important update, it was pushed onto all Windows 8.1 machines with Automatic Update installed.

There's been a lot of analysis of that patch. In my April 6 article, I came to the conclusion:




Is the patch an unwanted intrusion or just a convenient way to let Windows 7, 8, and 8.1 users upgrade to the (free) Windows 10? I guess that depends on your point of view. But it sure would've been nice if Microsoft had simply told us the truth, instead of sneaking another controversial come-on into its patch list.

Ed Bott posted a very thorough analysis of KB 3035583 in his ZDNet report, "Get Windows 10: Microsoft's hidden roadmap for the biggest software upgrade in history." Bott has a less-conspiratorial take on the evidence:


I have a hard time seeing this as adware. It is, instead, perfectly targeted advertising, offering a free upgrade to a product currently running on the system where the ad is being displayed. There are no hidden costs (aside from those incurred by the download itself) and the upgrade isn't going to be installed without your explicit consent. It can't, because there's at least one license agreement (and probably several) you're going to have to click through.

All of which is undoubtedly true.

On May 14, Microsoft released KB 3035583 yet again. The KB article doesn't mention any changes, and we really don't have a clue what was changed or why. The official Windows Update list KB 894199 says it's a "Recommended" update, which "supersedes KB 3035583 on Windows 8.1 and Windows 7." (Heaven only knows what that means.) My Windows 8.1 PCs list it as important, and checked for Automatic Update. My Windows 7 PCs list it as optional, and it's unchecked.

Whether you think of KB 3035583 as a potentially unwanted nagware program or perfectly targeted advertising, I think you'd agree that Microsoft's transparency doesn't inspire confidence.
********************

I called MS and yelled at the tech staff, they spent two hours while I read a book and they permanently blocked the download of this file. Asshloes!