View Single Post
Tippy Tippy is online now
Chain fence eating turbo
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by baloo View Post
Tippy and other turbo-ites,
I'm not quite understanding.
An IC is supposed to only improve HP over a non-IC'd turbo, no matter what the size, right?
So, do you mean one of the non intercooled turbo setups would be less than 200hp,?
Intercoolers that are restrictive cause the turbo to work extra hard to produce the same (or in this case I suspect) or less total CFM output as a lesser restrictive type.

This causes comp inefficiency (having to produce far higher boost pressure on compressor side than what is actually delivered to the intake) and turbine/exhaust side backpressure (more work to try an accomplish the same boost output as a less restrictive intercooler).

Double-whammy IMO.

Not to mention, the surface area is small too, allowing less heat dissipation than a better designed piece for his car.
__________________
Cory - turbo'd '87 C3.2 Guards/Blk, 3.4, 7.5:1 CR, 993SS cams, Borg-Warner S366 turbo @ 1.2-1.5 bar, Treadstone full bay IC, 70mm TB, TiAL F46 WG, HKS 1 1/2" BOV, twin 044 pumps, MicroSquirt AMP'd w/GM smart coilpack, Bilstein coilovers, Tramont replica Speedlines (285's rr, 225's frt), Big Reds frt, 993 rr., tower brace, MOMO wheel
Old 09-04-2015, 06:54 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #188 (permalink)