Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathans_Dad
A bit disappointed in the lawyer's comments, but not surprised. As has been said above, at some point our society is going to have to decide what is really worth suing over and what isn't. This attitude that you should just call a lawyer and throw something up against the wall to see if it sticks is going to kill our country.
.
|
The system isn't perfect, but it does have some built in safeguards.
As in this instance.
He can call lawyers, but that's a completely different thing than actually finding one to risk his own time and money to file a contingency suit.
I think it's unlikely.
Contingency lawyers like to see two things: (1) Clear liability, and (2) significant damages (like someone died, lost a limb, permanently disabled, significant brain damage, etc).
If both are present, any contingency lawyer would take the case.
If neither are present, almost all will not take the case.