[stuartj]

Originally Posted by flatbutt

So then that person is presenting an argument for the existence of Star Wars. I don't think you cab properly represent that with a single word (of course I could be wrong) but rather you must define the argument.

That person is arguing their belief that Star Wars is real , so you may define their belief in a single word, but not their argument.

Very good point. What Im after would refer to the method or nature of the argument. To torture the Star Wars analogy further - if the Star Wars fan were to present a full set of engineering specifications for the Death Star and claim it as proof that it would soon appear on our skies.