[berettafan]

Drove a 2006 (previous gen) Tundra for 10 years.

Just traded it on a 2013 Suburban LTZ. super cushy and has some neat features. the hvac system knows to wait to turn up the fan until the motor is warm, the heated and a/c seats are great, steering is surprisingly tight and precise, exhaust sound when it starts is quite pleasant, back up camera avoids the brail method of trailer hitching, etc. The highway ride is the best I've experienced and makes long trips less taxing.

Based on my experience the Toyota (though a newer design than what I had) would almost undoubtedly be the better functioning vehicle.

Google AFM issues if you want some reading on the GMT900 GM products. I took a chance and while i'm enjoying my new to me truck there is not a doubt in my mind the Tundra was a much better vehicle in the drivetrain department. Stories of 200,000 mile tahoes and suburbans are almost (if not entirely) exclusively relating to the prior two generations of vehicle and NOT the GMT900 platform ('07-13 or 14). I would like to take mine to 200k but my guess is i'll be bowing out at some point and moving to a sequiouoiuoaiuaoui when A) I can spell it reliably and b) the interior doesn't look like an 80's tercel.

That said I think newer sequoiuauoiuouas (changed in '15 I think) interiors look like they came from a '85 Toyota and are not even close to on par with other brands.