Sneak Peek of New Stainless Steel Headers

[JB]

Since others are showing theirs, I want to let everybody know about ours!

Available today for immediate shipment.....

Jim Buckley and Bryan Henderson have developed a stainless steel performance header system for air cooled 911's that incorporate many unique features and superior performance over the leading headers available today.

The first system developed is targeted for 2.7 - 3.2 liter normally asperated 911's and is a complete, bolt on racing system.

I would appreciate any feedback as more models & muffler options are currently being developed.

More information can be found at:

http://buckley-racing.com/911racingheaders.html

[TimT]

Quantos dinero?

[TimT]

Sorry didn't notice the price on the linked page

[BDHender]

For those who don't look at the link, this fully developed race ready system is a step header from 304 stainless supplied with a merge collector and integrated megaphone. They are available today and come for race applications with tuned diverging converging megaphones. A muffler system will be available in a couple of weeks for those who need to be quiet. Streetable versions are on the way. They are designed to be removed and installed quickly with a 1/4 inch drive flex socket and 9 inch extension. The slip fitting design removes the need to balance 3 gaskets on the top of the header while you install. We can remove and install a complete system in about 20 minutes. They fully clear the valve covers and oil lines.

The entire system was designed with computer aided design techniques. Design tolerances are truly equal length. Manufacturing goal is + or - 1/8. It is manufactured using a very unusual fixture that completely encircles the final step section in two places with only a few thousands clearance while the tubes flanges are bolted to a 1 in steel plate. You can't get them in the fixture if they are not correct.

The system is fully developed and tested. The system has been dyno proven by running it against the most popular system on the same dyno and same car within minutes on the same day. Every configuration during development has been tested this way to make sure it is the best it can be. It produces significantly better torque and horsepower than the most popular race systems available today. It has been race tested since last August and is a proven winner with a bunch of first place E class PCA wins already (15 to 30 cars in the class). At one race in late May there were six systems on track in the same race. They may be arriving at your competitions door next week.

Bryan

[kenikh]

Those are totally sick.

[Jeff Alton]

db's?

[safe]

Are the dynoresult 210 wheel hp?

[RarlyL8]

I doubt you can get 210whp from a CIS engine without extreme measures. If so please list some details.
Very nice headers!

[BDHender]

The sound level is fairly high. However, the system was run at Road America with a 103 DB limit and no call ins. It is quieter than a Cup car. We will be doing sound testing in the next ten days or so. We are developing a couple of muffler options.

Bryan

[safe]

Originally Posted by RarlyL8

I doubt you can get 210whp from a CIS engine without extreme measures. If so please list some details.
Very nice headers!

If it's crank hp it's only 6 hp over factory numbers for a stock euro 83 SC (as claimed).... Nice, but not very impressive.

[JB]

The dyno charts show horsepower and torque at the rear wheels (210hp and 191 ft-lbs). Testing was done on a Dynojet Dynamometer; I don't remember off the top of my head what model. The car tested is my Euro SC race car which is a stock spec 1981 930/10 motor with a relatively fresh rebuild with 3 race weekends on it. With the other leading brand headers, it made 194 RWHP.

Jim

[BDHender]

The 210 from an E stock Euro SC is at the rear wheels.

It did 221 on an 87 3.2 Carrera E stock car at the rear wheels up from 208 on the base line system. Torque went from 182.5 to 193.4.

The headers have been tested on a Dynojet in Texas and all comparisons are done the same car same day quickly changing the headers to get accurate comparative information. We have been getting increases in the 13 hp and 11 foot pound range over the most popular systems previously available.

Bryan

[RarlyL8]

The most tweaked stock CIS 3.0L engine I've come across put out 191HP at the wheels. To squeeze 210 at the wheels on CIS has got to be near maximum efficiency. Very impressive.

[JB]

It's all in the pipes!

[Sire]

Looks verry good, and hoping to see some development for the 964 (3.6).

[JB]

We have just complete the first round of testing on a stock 3.6l 964. In comparison to the current leading brand header, we made only +5.5 HP and + 5.2 ft-lbs of torque more at the rear wheels. This is a good result but we are not satisfied. Consequently, we are doing a re-design on the 3.6 version that should be ready for test in a few weeks.





One thing I should mention is that we're doing extensive testing on this product on both the dyno and the race track to ensure it has good performance, reliability and servicability.

Jim

[safe]

Originally Posted by BDHender

The 210 from an E stock Euro SC is at the rear wheels.

Bryan

That is impressive.

[JB]

Here are dyno results of our new header system on a 3.2l Carrera compared to SSI's. This was on a relatively fresh, stock motor which runs in PCA E class.

[911st]

How much for a 3.2 system?

[JB]

911ST, more information & price can be found here:

http://www.buckley-racing.com/911racingheaders.html

Thanks,

Jim