Quote:
Originally Posted by ossiblue
Not arguing your point. The robber that shot the unarmed bystander was shot by the CCL holder. The robber that later shot others was the second robber. The first robber did not die. The second robber has been caught. I have not found any information that the CCL shot at the fleeing robber.
The unarmed victim would have died anyway, given his actions. The unanswerable question is, if the first robber had not been shot, would the second robber have fired as he fled, wounding four other people?
Don't PARF this comment as it's just an observation. The CCL was carrying in violation of the policy of the Mall. There are four wounded people as the result of the fleeing robber's actions. The unanswerable question I posted could be grounds for civil cases against the CCL. Hopefully not, but one never knows.
Texas mall: Shopper who shot suspect not allowed to carry |
Like I said earlier, we have no idea if the robber who shot and killed the unarmed shopper would have continued killing unarmed shoppers.
He did not die as you correctly pointed out, but he was stopped from shooting any more from the CCL holder, but would he of shot any more people if not shot by the CCL holder? No one knows for sure.
But the known quantity, is he had killed once while fleeing. so he has proving he will kill.
Now as for the second robber shooting, we are only guessing that he did not have the same mind set as the killing robber and only shot out of self defense?
I really doubt that theory and think he would have shot his way out of there regardless of the CCL holder like the first robber was doing.