View Single Post
T77911S T77911S is offline
Registered
 
T77911S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MYR S.C.
Posts: 17,335
Quote:
Originally Posted by 911nut View Post
While I agree that CIS could possibly not produce fuel atomization as good as EFI, back pressure won't factor into that.
Any opportunity to reduce backpressure will enhance performance, regardless of fuel injection method.
Backpressure, besides reducing mass flow through the engine, causes reversion which dilutes the mixture with exhaust gases.
Everyone who has updated to the Garrett with CIS reports improvements over the KKK turbos. In fact I myself am upgrading to one this spring.
sure it would.
less back pressure and the mixture leans out on top. CIS cant really be adjusted for the fuel needed on boost and have good AFR's across the RPM range while on boost.
I see a of of guys on here with lean problems above about 6k running a low back pressure turbo like a garret.
__________________
86 930 94kmiles [__] RUNNING:[__] NOT RUNNING: ____77 911S widebody: SOLD
88 BMW 325is 200K+ SOLD
03 BMW 330CI 220K:: [__] RUNNING: [__] NOT RUNNING:
01 suburban 330K:: [__] RUNNING: [__] NOT RUNNING:
RACE CAR:: sold
Old 02-17-2017, 09:50 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)