View Single Post
ossiblue ossiblue is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Capistrano Beach, Ca.
Posts: 7,235
Quote:
Originally Posted by BReif61 View Post
Definitely needs more testing. I pulled the video up on my phone, and it appears to be testing the armor against a .30-cal or smaller ball round. This would be a minimal level of protection for currently soft-skinned vehicles.

As for making anything bulletproof? Not going to happen. Much like idiots, they just build better bullets. My guess? Anything AP or over .50cal goes RIGHT through this stuff.
The bullet was an armor piercing round. Here's the detail of the test:

"The shield was comprised of boron carbide ceramics as the strike face, with composite metal foam (CMF) as the bullet kinetic energy absorber layer and Kevlar panels as backplates. To test its durability, Rabiei and her team took aim with a 7.62 x 63 mm M2 armor-piercing projectile, which was fired in line with the standard testing procedures established by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ).

"We could stop the bullet at a total thickness of less than an inch, while the indentation on the back was less than 8 mm," Rabiei says. "To put that in context, the NIJ standard allows up to 44 mm (1.73 in) indentation in the back of an armor.
"

Lightweight metal foam turns armor-piercing bullets into dust
__________________
L.J.
Recovering Porsche-holic
Gave up trying to stay clean
Stabilized on a Pelican I.V. drip
Old 02-24-2017, 08:06 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #12 (permalink)