Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowling
38.4 (viii)
They could have reviewed and should have.
|
That is only the case if there was doubt about Sisson making contact with the puck
prior to the whistle. The referee's application of the rule was correct.
You should also read 38.2, because by rule it was reviewed:
Quote:
38.2
Goals
– Every goal is to be reviewed by the Video Goal Judge.
Upon making contact with the off-ice official at ice level, the Video
Goal Judge should say initially that he is “looking at the play”. If there
is a need to delay the resumption of the play, the off-ice official at ice
level should signal one of the Referees to delay the center ice face-off
for a moment. Once the Video Goal Judge has reviewed the video
and confirmed that the goal is valid, he should say that “it is a good
goal”. The off-ice official will then signal to the Referee to resume play.
|
If you were to dispute the goaltender interference ruling on the winning goal you might have more people agreeing with you.