Quote:
Originally Posted by svandamme
That's confusing a look with "beauty"
A look, it's something you can add or remove.
Like having a fetish for girls that dress in leather and ride a bike or what not.
Except that with tats, you can't remove em anymore.
But they are just that.. a look. You like the look.
The tat did not make her more pretty then she was before.
You would not think a 4/10 was suddenly an 8/10 because of the tats.
You wouldn't wanna tap that 4's ass , before, or after adding the tats.
That would not change.
You'de tap an 8 without question, with or without the tats.
|
What causes/creates beauty that's different from a look? I guess it could be the cranio-facial structure, but then how about skin tone, skin color, skin condition, hair color, hair length (or not) eye color, etc.... And with all of that, even if you're just talking about proportions and spacing of facial components, I'm sure that there are some folks that might find the same girl beautiful or not with blond, brown or blue hair or brown, green or blue eyes. Beauty is subjective, not objective so tats may totally do it for some folks.
__________________
Steve
'08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960
- never named a car before, but this is Charlotte.
'88 targa

SOLD 2004 - gone but not forgotten