My fingers could fall off from typing my differences with the current administration of "sissy hawks", ie. former draft dodgers who are now all too willing to wage wars and spill blood, (but not their children's, of course), to further their 'neoconservative' agenda. Lying to congress and the public about "evidence" that they have that Iraq is an imminent threat to the U.S. or tied to 9/11 somehow is not off-limits, the ends justify the means, right? And the ends have little or nothing to do with your best interests, Mr. Bush supporter, sorry to break that to you.
When I think of our soldiers or Iraqi children laying in the streets dead or dismembered, screaming in pain and screaming for their mothers, (that's the way it really goes down, John Wayne), juxtoposed w/ Bush posing on the flight deck in May, smiling with his underwear rolled in a ball and stuffed in his crotch, telling us "Mission Accomplished", I want to see him cry like the b!tch that he is. Al Gore at least has seen combat and been in a war zone in his life, plus he is one hell of a lot smarter. (Faint praise).
When neoconservative sissy hawks on talk radio talk about Democrats not "having the spine to use force", that should be translated as "not believing in expending our most valuable resource, the lives of our young people, unless all other options have been exhausted or for self defense". And no, I do not believe in the argument that we invaded Iraq as a "self defense", nor does anyone much else at this point.
The terrorist attacks on 9/11 were the best thing that ever happened for the neocons, a dream come true, now we can have an open-ended "war on terrorism", (never mind that terrorism cannot be fought w/ tanks or bombs, and they know this), and rule by fear, like I said, it's a fascist's dream come true. But it won't work on me.
