[jakermc]

I disagree about the 968 not having a WOW factor. Because it is so rare and most haven't seen it, the most common assumption from non-enthusiasts is that its a brand new model. The enthusiasts are also excited abot seeing one in the flesh. Remember, only 2500 coupes and 2500 cabs were brought to the U.S. during the entire 4 year production run. I get more comments when I am out driving the 968 than I do in either my Boxster S or 911.

Reliability of the 968, in my experience, has been great. Its also not that expensive to maintain as some have alluded to. I have no problem finding affordable parts and experienced labor to work on the car, though the latter could be an issue if you do not live in a large city (I am in the Dallas area).

Driving wise, the 911 is an absolute scream and the 968 bores me. Yes, the 968 is nicely balanced, but the Boxster S offers the same balance with a lot more performance. My 968 is a TIP, and with that transmission the car simply does not have enough guts. The low-end torque isn't there like it is on the other cars. I have not tracked the 968 yet but my hunch is I'll be be faster in the 911, even on the short courses. The 968 is easier to drive fast, but once learned, the 40/60 weight bias of the 911 can become as asset on the track.

Everyday livability, the 968 wins pretty easily. Besides the stuff mentioned, you've got to love the luggage space in the hatch.

It comes down to your priorities. If this is your only ride, I'd give the 968 serious consideration. If this is a pleasure vehicle, the 911 wins by a land slide.