[ficke]

Originally Posted by Matt Monson

No, there would still be a problem.
1. Buyer said he needed them for his own car. False premise.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/911-930-turbo-super-charging-forum/991189-im-looking-buy-rh-3-6-wheels-i-would-like-them-my-1992-965-a.html
2. Buyer/flipper used the seller’s photos to advertise and had not received nor inspected the parts. How do you sign your name to the condition of something you have never even seen?

1. I do not know what 'faapgar' told the seller, was flipping the car disclosed to seller? was that 'faapgar's intent? was there a false premise to seller? certainly a lot of people here wanted him to flip the car.
2. if 'faapgar' flipped the 356 to one of the many willing buyers here who made offers it would have been cool since he saw it and inspected it first at the sellers house? He could have had the Pelican he sold it to make shipping arrangement from the sellers house, handy.

This just smacks like double standards to me. or at best very fine nuances that are not easily clarified.
Sounds like the high horse integrity harping depends on the side of the fence some people are sitting on.